Stocks fell in reaction to sharply higher prices on oil, gas and energy-intensive commodities like urea, likely to weigh on global growth. And bonds fell as expected inflation rose in response to these commodity price hikes.
To wit: The MSCI World Index was down by 5.6%, while the STOXX Europe 600 lost 7.6%. Even the Bloomberg Global Aggregate returned -3.1%, its worst month since 2024. The S&P US Treasury Bond 10+ Year Index lost 3.9%, underscoring the risk in long-duration fixed coupon bonds. One may still assume that credit risk has added little to this number.
Not all was dark, though. The Norwegian benchmark index rose by 9.3%. Given its high exposure to energy – roughly one third of the index – this is hardly surprising. Brent crude ended March at $118.35 per barrel, an increase of almost $46 in but one month. No wonder, given that many experts describe it as the most significant supply impact ever – above and beyond the 1973 oil crisis.
How can one possibly navigate such events? How can a mere chief economist, or a fund manager, hope to foresee the unfolding of global events and the appearance of geopolitical shocks?
The simple answer: They can’t (at least, I can’t). We can always hope to discern President Trump’s next moves somehow, but absent proximity to the White House or his inner circle, I’d say it’s a vain hope.
However – we do have the option of preparing for such events – or in fact a range of eventualities – in advance. Case in point: For clients with a balanced mix of Norwegian and global stocks, the blow in March was indeed softened. And for an asset manager, putting together such a balanced portfolio is at the core of the job. That’s strategy. Trying to outguess geopolitics may be described as tactics, but it’s a really long shot.
Let me then quote the Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu (c. 544–496 BC), writing in The Art of War:
“Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.”